Talk:EKG sequence convergence: Difference between revisions
→Problem with task
m (tidy.) |
|||
Line 14:
* ''"I have modified the task to require EKG(9) and EKG(10)"'' - You've certainly shown that there is a need.
* ''"I think all the solutions will be wrong"'' - Not necessarily, they just need to cover the extra requirements. Their algorithms may be correct I mean.
::Debatable try EKG(any 4 dıgıt prıme). I stopped waıtıng after 20 mıns!!!!!--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
* ''"This divergence/convergence is illusionary"''. It is real. The Python generator that uses gcd is easiest for me to reason about. What it generates next is solely down to the state help in names <code>last</code> and <code>so_far</code>. If they coincide between two generators then those generators could not then diverge.<br>
::So what ıs convergence ıf the algorithm does not have <code>last</code> and <code>so_far</code>.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
I've learnt something more. Thanks Nigel. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:34, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
| |||