Talk:Doubly-linked list/Definition: Difference between revisions

(→‎Task definition is unclear?: Deprecate, and a suggested alternate route.)
Line 21:
I'm bumping this. Are built-in libraries allowed? I agree that "circular loops" are just part of the design and should be allowed. This needs to be refined. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
: This is one of the original tasks I created when I first launched Rosetta Code. I didn't even know of C++'s std::list at the time. For all I care, it (and its relations) can be deprecated and replaced with somet. In fact, I'd recommend that. One good alternate direction would be to seek to catalog and demonstrate all common container structures, in both library and transparent-implementation form. (Much like we have under [[:Category:Control Structures]], but perhaps a bit more ambitious with the transparent-implementation goal.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 05:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 
== Python attitude problem ==
 
The Python section is plain wrong. Linked list is for algorithms, not just normal data storage, saying "I'm high level language la la la" is just silly.
Anonymous user