Talk:Doubly-linked list/Definition: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 13:09, 6 February 2010 (view source) rosettacode>UnderBot m (moved Talk:Doubly-Linked List to Talk:Doubly-linked list/Definition) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:46, 9 February 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Mwn3d (→‎Task definition is unclear?: Bump) Newer edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	And the code itself, by the way, isn't required by this task, though it would clearly be useful to have data structures together with associated code for working with them. Should we update the task definition (and possibly make existing examples invalid)?[[User:Avmich\|Avmich]] 01:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)		And the code itself, by the way, isn't required by this task, though it would clearly be useful to have data structures together with associated code for working with them. Should we update the task definition (and possibly make existing examples invalid)?[[User:Avmich\|Avmich]] 01:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

			I'm bumping this. Are built-in libraries allowed? I agree that "circular loops" are just part of the design and should be allowed. This needs to be refined. --[[User:Mwn3d\|Mwn3d]] 20:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)