Talk:Diophantine linear system solving: Difference between revisions

→‎Totally lost: why show squares in null space?
m (→‎Totally lost: struckout "right now")
(→‎Totally lost: why show squares in null space?)
Line 40:
 
Thanks, I have slowly figured a couple of things out. That example means, I think, solve {2a+b=2, 6a+5b=2, 7a+6b=2} ==> the answer, from (-2 2)*-1, is {a=2,b=-2}. I was thinking (and about to say) that a proper set of unit tests on Reduce() would help, but actually what I think I really need <del>right now</del> is unit tests (/detailed examples) on Swop(), especially with what it is trying to do to d[], so I can properly visualise (and maybe even understand) it. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 16:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 
Also, you show the squares in the null space, can you explain why that might be useful? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 
=== Deserves to be on rc ===
7,796

edits