Talk:Determine sentence type: Difference between revisions

Line 38:
 
:If it was a pre-requisite that tasks be grammatically and semantically correct, about half (or more) of the existing tasks would not exist. While I don't disagree about the suspect task text, or the (lack of) coverage of edge conditions, whining about it without proposing any alternatives is counter-productive. To be fair, just about any rule you could come up regarding the structure and layout of English (American or otherwise) has some counter-example, so it will be difficult to come up with a comprehensive solution. The Lingua::EN::Sentence module used in the Raku entry has several large tables of abbreviations, grammatical constructs, and exceptions to try to intelligently break blocks of text into sensible sentences; but even that is probably only about 95-98% accurate, especially if you start throwing deliberately obfuscatory constructs at it. Is it good enough? Depends on your set of circumstances. Is is better than a few regexes? I would hope so, but again, depends on your requirements. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 17:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 
:: Sooner or later we will be seeing junk/ironic tasks generated by GPT-3, or something like it.
:: I don't ''think'' this has started yet, but we do seem to be falling into some kind of hyper-inflationary gravity well or general collapse of quality. I don't know why ...
:: Time to think about making the pre-requisites fractionally more visible and robust ?
:: Triage by punctuation mark seems to lack a certain something ... [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
9,655

edits