Anonymous user
Talk:Date format: Difference between revisions
→Input: High-five, Dmitry
(Let's make it ISO 8601) |
(→Input: High-five, Dmitry) |
||
Line 4:
:: The page has been tagged as "This task has been clarified". But it has not been clarified. It still does not say how the date is given. I agree that current date would be a good choice, that should be added to the task description. --[[User:PauliKL|PauliKL]] 09:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
::: If any output format is to be chosen then that should be one of ISO 8601, I suppose. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 12:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
::::ISO sounds like a great idea. If we want to make things the same across all languages, why not us a standard, right? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 14:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
==Leading zeros==
| |||