Talk:Create a two-dimensional array at runtime: Difference between revisions

(→‎AutoIT Incorrect?: new section)
Line 5:
: because for that dim2 would have to be a compile time constant. It ''would'' be a solution if you dropped the requirement that ''both'' dimensions are given at run time. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 12:41, 11 January 2008 (MST)
:: This sort of task suggests a limit to the chrestomathy format for language comparison. Perhaps programming languages with dynamic orientation should be excluded from this sort of task, as such languages cannot demonstrate anything other than their normal array-creation features? How might we identify language features so that statuses like "impossible" or "not applicable" could be clear? --[[User:TBH|TBH]] 15:12, 11 January 2008 (MST)
 
== AutoIT Incorrect? ==
 
The AutoIT doesn't appear to get values from the user. They are embedded within the program source. Should this be marked as incorrect?