Talk:Create a two-dimensional array at runtime: Difference between revisions
Talk:Create a two-dimensional array at runtime (view source)
Revision as of 13:43, 10 September 2013
, 10 years ago→OoRexx: drop missing?
(→AutoIT Incorrect?: new section) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→OoRexx: drop missing?) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
: because for that dim2 would have to be a compile time constant. It ''would'' be a solution if you dropped the requirement that ''both'' dimensions are given at run time. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 12:41, 11 January 2008 (MST)
:: This sort of task suggests a limit to the chrestomathy format for language comparison. Perhaps programming languages with dynamic orientation should be excluded from this sort of task, as such languages cannot demonstrate anything other than their normal array-creation features? How might we identify language features so that statuses like "impossible" or "not applicable" could be clear? --[[User:TBH|TBH]] 15:12, 11 January 2008 (MST)
::: Demonstrating a languages normal array-creation features is fine for dynamic language examples. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
== AutoIT Incorrect? ==
The AutoIT doesn't appear to get values from the user. They are embedded within the program source. Should this be marked as incorrect?
: Probably. I'm normally fuzzy about this kind of requirements, but the AutoIt example really doesn't make it clear if the array sizes are flexible. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 23:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
:: How to mark it as incorrect? Is there an input template?
::: <nowiki>{{incorrect|AutoIt|reasoning for mark it so}}</nowiki> --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 00:11, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
The shown example was wrong!
I've now created a working example. Here you can see, that both dimensions can set by user at runtime.
== OoRexx ==
"up to 999,999,999 dimensions"<br>
shouldn't this be up to 999,999,999 elements??<br>
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 09:23, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
: nobody cares? and the snippet does not show how the array is deleted (Drop ??) --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 13:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
| |||