Talk:Cousin primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→task needs clarification: added some wording.) |
m (→task needs clarification: added wording.) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
I think this task, in addition to showing the cousin primes in whatever manner is chosen or specified, also include as a summary, the ''number'' of (unique) cousin primes found, whether or not a count of cousin prime pairs is also shown, and style choices can be problematic at Rosetta Code. |
I think this task, in addition to showing the cousin primes in whatever manner is chosen or specified, also include as a summary, the ''number'' of (unique) cousin primes found, whether or not a count of cousin prime pairs is also shown, and style choices can be problematic at Rosetta Code. |
||
Maybe this task should also specify if the cousin primes are to be listed in pairs (or not), dealer's choice? I prefer a simple list of cousin primes (not shown in pairs), as it looks simpler and less cluttered, but it's only an opinion. |
Maybe this task should also specify if the cousin primes are to be listed in pairs (or not), dealer's choice? I prefer a simple list of cousin primes (not shown in pairs), as it looks simpler and less cluttered (and solves/bypasses the problem of counting cousin primes), but it's only an opinion. |
||
This also raises the question (again), '''if''' we were to (for instance) list all cousin primes less than 100, should '''97''' be shown? --- Of course it should, because it ''is'' a cousin prime; but its (higher paired) cousin prime is out of range. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC) |
This also raises the question (again), '''if''' we were to (for instance) list all cousin primes less than 100, should '''97''' be shown? --- Of course it should, because it ''is'' a cousin prime; but its (higher paired) cousin prime is out of range. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC) |