Talk:Convex hull: Difference between revisions
Ok, that IS a bug.
m (:) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (Ok, that IS a bug.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 130:
:::::: Apparently that's not legal Raku (I put the one = back in and it's fine again, took that one char out and it broke again, a real ??!!??WTF??!! moment):
::::::: Ah, of course: it starts with ((-3, -9), (
Convex Hull (7 points): [(-3, -9) (19, -8) (17, 5) (12, 17) (5, 19) (-3, 15) (-9, -3)]
Too few positionals passed; expected 3 arguments but got 2
Line 139:
exit status 1
:::::: The diagram at 1:00 of the Youtube link is very clear on this matter, plus what he says at 1:22, it seems common sense to me that if the set is every pixel used to draw a 400x400 square outline, the convex hull is 4 points, not all 1,596. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 03:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::::Ah. Ok, '''that''' definitely ''is'' a bug, untrapped edge condition. I'll fix that. While I'm at it, I'll edit the example to ignore colinear points. I don't think my interpretation was completely bogus, but you've convinced me that it is '''less''' correct. (And it's changing one character, not a big deal.) --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 14:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
| |||