Talk:Convert decimal number to rational: Difference between revisions

(We definitely need lowest terms.)
Line 9:
Are we talking about only rationals? What about 3.14159265...? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 06:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
:Well if you can express it as a finite decimal expansion ... :-)<br>--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
:Presumably we are only working to the precision (or double precision) of the system registers, (or to the number of digits originally provided in numerical string based implementations), so the values would all be rational. --[[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 12:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)