Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Using r2cf as Generator a in Continued fraction: Naming matters) |
(→Using r2cf as Generator a in Continued fraction: Note on linking) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Sorry I may have missed something but what does r2cf stand for?--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC) |
:Sorry I may have missed something but what does r2cf stand for?--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “<tt>Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>” would be a first guess; opinions? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
:: From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “<tt>Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>” would be a first guess; opinions? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:01, 5 February 2013
Using r2cf as Generator a in Continued fraction
Note that Continued fraction assumes Generators a and b are infinite. You may have to adjust Continued fraction to allow for r2cf terminating. The generator for sqrt2 may be used with r2cf.--Nigel Galloway 13:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry I may have missed something but what does r2cf stand for?--Grondilu 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number” would be a first guess; opinions? –Donal Fellows 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and wp: links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –Donal Fellows 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)