Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
Line 7: Line 7:
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
:: IAWTC--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 13:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
:: IAWTC--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 13:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

== Titles are messed up ==


All CF-related articles should be under a general Continued fraction/ section. For instance, this article should be: "Continued fraction/r2cf" or "Continued fraction/From a Rational"--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] 13:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)