Anonymous user
Talk:Constrained random points on a circle: Difference between revisions
Talk:Constrained random points on a circle (view source)
Revision as of 13:34, 3 September 2010
, 13 years ago→Uniform distribution
No edit summary |
|||
Line 43:
I'm not very good with stats, but I've seen discussions pop up before about different distributions of points. Is uniform vs normal vs (something?) a significant component of the task? How may it be verified with at most 100 points? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 12:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
I guess that if you count the number of points that lie on a line that passes through the center, then the count should not depend on the angle of that line. So it would be wrong to simply pick a uniform-random value of x and then a uniform-random of y at that location, because that would tend to lead to a higher density of points on the left and right sides (look at the maximally dense version above: there are 12 possible values of y at x==0; but only one at x == +/- 15) -- and thus a greater number of points away from the x-axis. A common mistake when generating a set of linked random variables is that the distribution depends on the order in which they are generated.
So, take this Perl code:
Line 69:
#
# # # # #
#
#
# #▼
# #▼
▲ # #
# ##▼
▲ # #
#
## # #
#
# # # ##
# #
# #
▲ ## #
▲ ## ### # # #
▲ ## # # # #
▲ # ## ##
▲ ### #
▲ # #
</pre>
|