Talk:Compare sorting algorithms' performance: Difference between revisions
(→optional requirement: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
There are circumstances where performance is measured as a metric of space consumed vs time consumed. Does anyone have any thoughts as to how we could create a task that can measure that metric? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 04:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC) |
There are circumstances where performance is measured as a metric of space consumed vs time consumed. Does anyone have any thoughts as to how we could create a task that can measure that metric? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 04:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
== optional requirement == |
|||
The [[Write float arrays to a text file]] task should be marked as an optional pre-requisite. In some languages using a file for the intermediate results would just add complexity to the task. --14:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:36, 16 February 2010
Where did this come from? Can we get some implementations in other languages? --Short Circuit 23:43, 4 February 2008 (MST)
I've written it bottom-up unless stated otherwise for some fragments. This task show Python strength in ad-hoc scripting. I think Ruby's version could be feasible. I don't have an expertise to write it myself. --Goku Sama 02:49, 5 February 2008 (MST)
Time performance vs space performance
There are circumstances where performance is measured as a metric of space consumed vs time consumed. Does anyone have any thoughts as to how we could create a task that can measure that metric? --Short Circuit 04:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
optional requirement
The Write float arrays to a text file task should be marked as an optional pre-requisite. In some languages using a file for the intermediate results would just add complexity to the task. --14:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)