Talk:Colorize diff output: Difference between revisions
→possible rename of the task: Rename or remove?
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (Is this supposed to be a task?) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→possible rename of the task: Rename or remove?) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
== Is this supposed to be a task? ==
If so, you are missing task markup, a task description, a goal, or really anything to help someone implement an entry. Also I assume this is Gnu diff-utils diff? If so, you are aware of the <code>--color</code> option? As in: <code>diff --color FILE1 FILE2</code> What's the point? --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 23:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Agreed, it could be as simple as describing what you do to what input and asking others to do the same. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 13:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
== possible rename of the task ==
I suggest a possible renaming of the task:
'''Colorize different parts of some text to be displayed'''
--- or something along those lines. I'm assuming that some colorized text being displayed (or parts of the text) is to be colorized (possibly with more than one section, and possibly with each section being a different color). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 14:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
: If we are just to demonstrate colorizing parts of text in a terminal, would not [[Checksumcolor]] already cover that? I reiterate; What's the point? (Not to Gerard, to the original author) --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 16:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
| |||