Talk:Circles of given radius through two points: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(→More special cases: Task desc is not self-consistent) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:::: I was talking about when you do get a zero circle as a solution. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] ([[User talk:Ledrug|talk]]) 22:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
:::: I was talking about when you do get a zero circle as a solution. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] ([[User talk:Ledrug|talk]]) 22:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::I could change it or leave it. Either case would work as the task explicitly states what to do with the r == 0.0 case, currently. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
:::I could change it or leave it. Either case would work as the task explicitly states what to do with the r == 0.0 case, currently. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::The task states two mutually-incompatible things in that case. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 12:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::And dealing with nearly "normal" specifications are an important part of programming ;-)<br> --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
:::And dealing with nearly "normal" specifications are an important part of programming ;-)<br> --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
||