Anonymous user
Talk:Circles of given radius through two points: Difference between revisions
Talk:Circles of given radius through two points (view source)
Revision as of 19:35, 3 March 2021
, 3 years ago→More special cases: fixed a typo.
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) m (what's a reference?) |
m (→More special cases: fixed a typo.) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
==More special cases==
There may be more special cases. If p1==p2 and r==0, there is one unique answere that's a zero radius circle. If
<lang python>from math import sqrt
Line 35:
== XPL0 ==
REXX referred to XPL0.
This
I restored now the old section --Walter Pachl 08:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Line 43:
:: What's that other than a reference? --Walter Pachl 08:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
::: A reference could be anything that referenced (mentioned) something else by name but not necessarily contained herein on Rosetta Code --- for instance, the language '''xyz''' used/uses the assumption(s) yadda-yadda-yadda, or entry '''xyz''' used a similar approach, logic, data (for input), ... or any other number of things, most often (but not limited to) somewhere in the entry's preamble (or comments made elsewhere). However, a <nowiki> {{trans|XPL0}} </nowiki> means that (in this case) the '''REXX''' entry used (most likely) the '''XPL0''' entry (the source code here on this Rosetta Code task) as a basis or prototype for the computer programming language translation. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 09:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
:Walter, the XPL0 was actually never ''removed'': [http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Circles_of_given_radius_through_two_points&diff=209250&oldid=208439 this edit] adding the entry on Visual FoxPro mistakenly ended with a ''pre'' HTML tag, which made the XPL0 entry show up at the end of the VisualFox Pro entry. I'll remove it now. [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 20:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
|