Talk:Cipolla's algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 19:19, 28 March 2016 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (→‎Delete this task? (edit: looks like no, just need to better describe the algorithm)) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:23, 29 March 2016 (view source) rosettacode>G.Brougnard m (A happy ending) Newer edit →
Line 111:		Line 111:

	::::::::: Analogies are fine. And they can be useful for describing algorithms. But that does not mean that they are always adequate descriptions. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 19:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)		::::::::: Analogies are fine. And they can be useful for describing algorithms. But that does not mean that they are always adequate descriptions. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 19:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

			:::::::::: Cipolla must be happy to see at least two implementations of his algorithm. He had serious doubts about its validity. :-) --[[User:G.Brougnard\|G.Brougnard]] ([[User talk:G.Brougnard\|talk]]) 15:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)