Anonymous user
Talk:Chowla numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→What does the quote by Gauss have to do with this task?: added a comment.
m (→What does the quote by Gauss have to do with this task?: answered.) |
m (→What does the quote by Gauss have to do with this task?: added a comment.) |
||
Line 52:
(''Dune'' also had some very poignant epigraphs as well.)
:::: I have never read responses (or opinions) on the above books on whether or not that those epigraphs should/shouldn't be included in the respective books, or even a discussion on they being appropriate (or not), or even the merits of the quoted texts. We could discuss the merits of Gauss' opinion, but that wasn't the point of the epigraph. When one discusses the book ''Frankenstein'', John Milton's quote is <u>never</u> talked about (well, except for here). I never thought that adding an epigraph would ruffle so many feathers. I had thought that the collegiate reader's minds on Rosetta Code would appreciate a relevant quote. To move the epigraph to the discussion page would surely distract from the Rosetta Code task of chowla numbers. But perhaps a discussion on number theory and how '''chowla numbers''' relates to that would be refreshing. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:28, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
==Large computations==
| |||