Anonymous user
Talk:Chowla numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→Mistakenly posted discussion on the task page: added a couple of comments.
m (→Mistakenly posted discussion on the task page: added a couple of comments.) |
m (→Mistakenly posted discussion on the task page: added a couple of comments.) |
||
Line 60:
== Mistakenly posted discussion on the task page ==
The comments below were in response to some inappropriate remarks made within the '''Perl 6''' header section, which have since been removed. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
:: "We" aren't using a thing poorly suited to finding prime numbers. This Rosetta Code task (as also the totient function task) is to show that it ''can'' find or determine prime numbers, and as a proof/validation that the computer programs work. No one is disputing that these tasks are not suited to find prime numbers. These kinds of silly statements don't belong on this page, the ''discussion'' page is more suited for that, but try to keep the tone civil instead of condescending and demeaning. Please try and keep this site professional. If you don't know why a task requirement was included, then ask (on the task discussion page or a user discussion page). It's this sort of sniping that some people are being critical of Rosetta Code. People don't respond to rudeness and pettiness. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:24, 12 March 2019 (UTC) (this task's author).
| |||