Talk:Chowla numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→What does the quote by Gauss have to do with this task?: added a comment.) |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
: It might be worse; Mathematicians and Physicists argue/joke about which is the better from before programmers bickered over Vi vs Emacs. (Vim of course). |
: It might be worse; Mathematicians and Physicists argue/joke about which is the better from before programmers bickered over Vi vs Emacs. (Vim of course). |
||
: Omitting the quote might make for a better task as it is not clear what it adds. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
: Omitting the quote might make for a better task as it is not clear what it adds. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: The quote is an epigraph. Chowla numbers (or its function) has significant relevance concerning number theory. It wasn't meant to take attention away from the task at hand, but to add reflection. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==Large computations== |
==Large computations== |
||