Talk:Chowla numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
: Do we really need to agree on this kind of thing ? Optional seems more than good enough [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 12:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
: Do we really need to agree on this kind of thing ? Optional seems more than good enough [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 12:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: +1 for that. See below. If the language supports |
:: +1 for that. See below. If the language supports locales for numbers then OK. Writing a subroutine putting commas every 3 digits in an Anglophobe interpretation of appropriate seems worse than pointless almost stupid.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 15:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
==http://www.syllabus.ca/en/didyouknow-en/writing-numbers-in-french-and-english/== |
==http://www.syllabus.ca/en/didyouknow-en/writing-numbers-in-french-and-english/== |
||