Anonymous user
Talk:Catmull–Clark subdivision surface: Difference between revisions
Talk:Catmull–Clark subdivision surface (view source)
Revision as of 15:19, 18 January 2010
, 14 years ago→Algorithm Description Improvements: new section
(Looks nice, but some suggested tweaks.) |
(→Algorithm Description Improvements: new section) |
||
Line 85:
[[Image:Catmull_subsurf.png]]
:: Looks good, but I would suggest breaking it into three images and losing the built-in descriptor lines. I would also suggest stretching the contrast ratio such that it's white on black, rather than light-gray on dark-gray. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 08:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
== Algorithm Description Improvements ==
I've tried to improve the description of the algorithm (making it look more like math and less like computer code) but may have made a few bloopers along the way. A full mathematical version would be even better, except that I doubt that most people would immediately pick up the notation for a centroid and so would go horribly astray. Still, if someone can do some more work on it I'd be glad. Note also that neither the Wikipedia article nor this task are particularly good references; for example, the WP article only handles the hole-free mesh case. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
| |||