Talk:Catmull–Clark subdivision surface: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (move more recent discuss at the end) |
(→Remove non-working OCaml example: I think we should consider design, not detail, for deletion) |
||
| Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
Since nobody seems to be trying to fix the first OCaml example, perhaps it should be removed. Should we check with the original author first? - [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 17:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
Since nobody seems to be trying to fix the first OCaml example, perhaps it should be removed. Should we check with the original author first? - [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 17:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Hi, I think candidate for deletion should rather be considering if an implementation is poor at the design point of view. Here the code produces wrong output but the error is probably a minor calculation error somewhere. There is also the Tcl example that produces wrong output on the border of the hole. Borders of holes should be smooth, and on the screenshot we can see that it's not. [[User:Blue Prawn|Blue Prawn]] 23:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||