Talk:Carmichael 3 strong pseudoprimes: Difference between revisions
Talk:Carmichael 3 strong pseudoprimes (view source)
Revision as of 10:54, 25 September 2016
, 7 years agoAny visibility at all would be a "far more pleasing layout" than a blank space
(perhaps because of the font dependency issue) |
(Any visibility at all would be a "far more pleasing layout" than a blank space) |
||
Line 8:
:: Yes, Firefox happens to be in the minority in respect of how it handles formulae (local processing of MathML, where requisite fonts are available) – most browsers currently take the route of displaying the graphic file – perhaps because of the font dependency issue). Support for the MathML route is at about 25%, and excludes Chrome, IE/Draft, and Safari. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
:: If it looks hard to get your formula to display in the majority of browsers, perhaps an explanatory note to the reader ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
::: Any visibility at all would be a "far more pleasing layout" than a blank space :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
==clarification of Carmichael 3 strong pseudomprimes==
| |||