Talk:Carmichael 3 strong pseudoprimes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→listing in ascending order: added a comment about perusing. -- ~~~~) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I was thinking about listing the triplets in ascending order. |
I was thinking about listing the triplets in ascending order. |
||
It would be a nice feature when showing the results. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 22:07, 10 December 2012 (UTC) |
It would be a nice feature when showing the results. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 22:07, 10 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
Implemented. It does make the reading of the Carmichael numbers much easier to peruse. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==Python issues?== |
==Python issues?== |
Revision as of 06:47, 11 December 2012
listing in ascending order
I was thinking about listing the triplets in ascending order. It would be a nice feature when showing the results. -- Gerard Schildberger 22:07, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Implemented. It does make the reading of the Carmichael numbers much easier to peruse. -- Gerard Schildberger 06:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Python issues?
Having had two languages base their entries on the Python but mention with changes I thought I should ask what it is I have done wrong. (I'm braced, go ahead...)
--Paddy3118 06:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)