Talk:CalmoSoft primes: Difference between revisions
→Raku incorrect: fair point, ten seconds it is
(→Raku incorrect: Problem with Algol stretch result.) |
(→Raku incorrect: fair point, ten seconds it is) |
||
Line 16:
:I agree with your result for primes < 250 and also disagree with some of the other Raku results. Your 2 second target for the stretch goal may be a bit ambitious for the interpreted languages as it takes Wren 2.6 seconds to sieve for primes up to 50 million before even starting to figure out the longest CalmoSoft prime sequence! --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 10:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
:::Fair point, ten seconds it is - fwiw my sieve to 5e7 takes 1.4s, the rest 0.7s. --[[User:Petelomax|Petelomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 11:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
::I also agree your 250 prime result. I also agree that interpreted languages may struggle to do it in 2 seconds. See the notes on the Algol 68 stretch sample. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 10:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
| |||