Talk:CalmoSoft primes: Difference between revisions
→Raku incorrect: Problem with Algol stretch result.
(→Raku incorrect: Also agree the 250 prime sequence result) |
(→Raku incorrect: Problem with Algol stretch result.) |
||
Line 18:
::I also agree your 250 prime result. I also agree that interpreted languages may struggle to do it in 2 seconds. See the notes on the Algol 68 stretch sample. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 10:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
:::Re the Algol 68 stretch result, something seems to have gone awry as the sum of the sub-sequence (72619548630200) is clearly not prime. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 11:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
| |||