Talk:Call a function: Difference between revisions
→Huh?
(→Huh?: seems plain to me) |
(→Huh?) |
||
Line 13:
::::Maybe? But my real gripe is that this distinction hasn't made it into the task description. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 18:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
:::::I think it's quite obvious which meaning of "function" is intended here: "a function is something you call". Nobody should have a corner on the One True Vocabulary on a site like RosettaCode. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] 18:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
::::::Maybe. But, I think that that reasoning conflicts with the ''Some languages have different mechanisms for functions and subroutines'' bit from the first part of this talk page. That said, right now, given your reasoning, I am leaning towards the "anything that can be said to be equivalent to language X's concept of a function" concept of "function", where X="ZX Spectrum Basic". --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 19:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||