Anonymous user
Talk:Calkin-Wilf sequence: Difference between revisions
→Off by one error?: Task wording fixed.
(→Off by one error?: Index starts from one.) |
(→Off by one error?: Task wording fixed.) |
||
Line 26:
:: I read the wp entry some more as well as others, and I agree, there is no zero'th indexed item. The series ''starts from the 1-indexed item which has a value of 1''. Different methods of arriving at the i'th term, for i being one of all positive integers '''not''' including zero, agree. Extrapolating to a zero'th term do not, and have no meaning in terms of the tree that is traversed to form the series.
:: I could amend the task description... --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
::: Description fixed. Examples flagged. It is a great task. This is just a minor change. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
| |||