Talk:CSV to HTML translation: Difference between revisions

screenshots
(→‎Output rendering: Not too worried about image data for the moment. Pondering offscreen rendering.)
(screenshots)
Line 4:
:: A screenshot could be a good idea, while I guess every contributor would display the HTML code in a different browser. But while images take space, is rosettacode's hosting able to host all these images? [[User:Blue Prawn|Blue Prawn]] 19:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
::: As far as bandwidth? I don't know. It really depends on what kind of traffic we get, I suppose. Disk space? RC currently has 30MB of image data in the /images folder, so I'm not particularly worried about it right now. (I do prefer liberal application of tools like pngcrush, though.) As far as variations on implementation...I'm wondering what the current state of offscreen, no-X, no-Win32 render-it-to-a-file is for HTML. That's a plausible way to go about this kind of thing, too. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 22:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
:::: Here are two screenshots with the "links" web browser:
:::: [[Image:Csv2html ocaml links kde frame.png|CSV to HTML OCaml, with links browser under KDE]]
:::: 2,8K (2866 octets)
:::: [[Image:Csv2html ocaml links blackbox frame.png|CSV to HTML OCaml, with links browser under blackbox]]
:::: 2,4K (2408 octets)
:::: (pngcrunsh saved 24 octets on the blackbox one.)
:::: [[User:Blue Prawn|Blue Prawn]] 00:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC)