Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions
→REXX: please change the line in the program
m (→REXX: changed wording of comment to reflect the what/who/where REXX program. -- ~~~~) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→REXX: please change the line in the program) |
||
Line 205:
::: If you're addressing those statements/questions to me: I don't think that Regina is wrong nor do I think that Regina is right. I don't feel comfortable explaining my philosophy on why or why not I accept (the correctness) of certain REXX implementations --- especially on Rosetta Code, not many REXX authors (coders/writers of REXX interpreters) visit here, as far as I can discern. In the case of Regina REXX, it has its own location for reporting (possible) bugs. I know a lot of REXX authors read (subscribe to) the '''comp.lang.rexx''' newsgroup. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
:::: Only ONE Rexx (Regina) did not reject that c2d invocation. Can you please update this line
<lang rexx>
numeric digits 10 /*only needed for ooRexx. */
</lang>
to something like
<lang rexx>
numeric digits 10 /*not needed for Regina. */
</lang>
"In the case of Regina REXX, it has its own location for reporting (possible) bugs."
It has been reported there (on sourceforge)! For other Rexxes there is nothing to report (except that Roo, I think it was, does not behave as the others. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 20:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
| |||