Revision as of 08:32, 18 August 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎REXX: made an unclear comment more unclear; it's now clear as mud, but it covers the ground. -- ~~~~) ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:54, 18 August 2013 (view source) Walterpachl (talk \| contribs) (thanks for testing) Newer edit →
Line 107: <br>A     '''say 'digits=' digits()'''     would be a nice addition. <br><br>But in any case   (all were executed under a Windows/XP DOS window (cmd.exe):<br><br> '''output''' from Regina ~~  (including 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7)~~: <pre> REXX-Regina_3.7(MT) 5.00 14 Oct 2012 Line 136: Statement context: D:\crud0.rex, procedure: badwalter </pre> ~~Differentially~~Clearly, different REXXes which are different are behaving differently ~~(or indifferently?)~~. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 08:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC) ----- :: Thanks for testing. The 'test case' was not for any program. (I tested the Rexx compiler for VM and then TSO and used such a framework for all programs. Anyway, you see that not only ooRexx does follow the specs (Regina doesn't!?!) - the "obnoxious" statement is therefore not just for ooRexx. right? If you use primarily Regina you won't notice this "problem" right?? --[[User:Walterpachl\|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl\|talk]]) 08:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions

Talk:CRC-32 (view source)