Anonymous user
Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions
m
Insert more section headers.
(→Error correction: What about LDPC codes?) |
m (Insert more section headers.) |
||
Line 21:
:::::::: oops. I just realized I was looking at the big-endian table in info-zip. after checking the little endian table, it matches the php table named crc32b_table. --[[User:Coderjoe|Coderjoe]] 08:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
===Exact task requirement===
We still don't have an answer to the question "What do we need to do to fulfill this task?". How about stating:
: ''"Implement the CRC commonly known as ... whose equation is ... . Use it to generate a checksum for the following bytes ..."''
Line 30 ⟶ 31:
::::: I can't answer that. But it is in the [[MD5/Implementation]] which is closer in principle to this task. [[MD5]] frequently just calls libraries that have been validated elsewhere. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 13:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
===Use a library?===
Is using a built-in implementation acceptable? Or a library? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
:Given some of the above discussion (for example: "A generic function, while theoretically interesting...") I assumed that using a built-in was desirable. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 15:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
| |||