Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Insert more section headers.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
: No. CRC is for error ''detection'', not error correction. You'd be more interested in [[wp:Hamming code|Hamming code]]. We have [[Hamming numbers]], but I don't think they're related. (If they are, it's not clear how, at least not on RC.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |
: No. CRC is for error ''detection'', not error correction. You'd be more interested in [[wp:Hamming code|Hamming code]]. We have [[Hamming numbers]], but I don't think they're related. (If they are, it's not clear how, at least not on RC.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:: I suggest something based on [[wp:Low-density parity-check code|Gallager code]]s would be appropriately beefy, as those are used in very high performance applications like transmissions from satellites. If that doesn't satisfy you, Spekkio, I don't know what will. :-) Different task though. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 17:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC) |
:: I suggest something based on [[wp:Low-density parity-check code|Gallager code]]s would be appropriately beefy, as those are used in very high performance applications like transmissions from satellites. If that doesn't satisfy you, Spekkio, I don't know what will. :-) Different task though. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 17:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
::: Thanks, that is very interesting :D --[[User:Spekkio|Spekkio]] 10:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||