Anonymous user
Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions
→Size of example string
(→Size of example string: 8 bit) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 262:
::: common tasks (such as CRCs, multiple ADC readings, zero crossing for motor control). Making this string
::: a little longer makes it compatible with blinding fast hardware circuitry. I think its just keeping up with the times.
::: CRC-32 is often used to validate a block of data, not just transmission lines.:wq --[[User:Robin48gx|Robin48gx]] ([[User talk:Robin48gx|talk]])
::::Mind you, they are still shipping shed loads of 16 and 8 bit processors as they are smaller, cheaper and more power efficient ;-)<br>--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 14:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
::::Robin48gx, what you say is completely irrelevant for all the reasons I gave. —[[User:dchapes|dchapes]] ([[User talk:dchapes|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/dchapes|contribs]]) 18:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
| |||