Talk:CORDIC: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== Validity == (1) The task description currently says that the algorithm is valid for values of alpha up to π/2 but it seems that that limit should be π/4. (2) The accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly smaller than π/4 isn't very good (for example: at 0.784 radians), but it's *much* better than the accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly larger than π/4 (for example 0.786 radians). --~~~~") |
m (tighten formatting) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Validity == |
== Validity == |
||
The task description currently says that the algorithm is valid for values of alpha up to π/2 but it seems that that limit should be π/4. The accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly smaller than π/4 isn't very good (for example: at 0.784 radians), but it's *much* better than the accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly larger than π/4 (for example 0.786 radians). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 13:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
(2) The accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly smaller than π/4 isn't very good (for example: at 0.784 radians), but it's *much* better than the accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly larger than π/4 (for example 0.786 radians). |
|||
--[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 13:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:33, 10 July 2023
Validity
The task description currently says that the algorithm is valid for values of alpha up to π/2 but it seems that that limit should be π/4. The accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly smaller than π/4 isn't very good (for example: at 0.784 radians), but it's *much* better than the accuracy of the algorithm at values slightly larger than π/4 (for example 0.786 radians). --Rdm (talk) 13:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)