Anonymous user
Talk:Bulls and cows: Difference between revisions
m
→REXX version 2: added comments about a questionable statement. -- ~~~~
m (→malformed numbers: added clarification wording. -- ~~~~) |
m (→REXX version 2: added comments about a questionable statement. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 80:
The s-removal was to show another way to provide that functionality (if bulls and cows should be changed to fox and geese)
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 04:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
:: The removal of the '''S''' subroutine wasn't being questioned, only the comment on the example page for REXX version 2 saying that the version 1 code didn't work for all plurals. It was asked if it could fail for the program as coded (for bulls and cows). It wasn't stated anywhere that it worked for all plurals. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 14:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
----
Actually the change of ? to qq was NOT necessary. ? IS allowed on TSO. However, I never use(d) it.
| |||