Anonymous user
Talk:Break OO privacy: Difference between revisions
m
→Context?: Sp.
(→Context?: Not the debugger.) |
m (→Context?: Sp.) |
||
Line 17:
::: I modified the task description to reflect what I think was the intent of the task. (<s>Mwn3d</s>Paddy, are my modifications congruent with what you had in mind?) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
::::Sorry, I've been away. Back now! <br>The intent was to show ways to circumvent such protection when, for example, you are given a compiled class and wish to force access to a protected member. The reason for the task is that Python - a language that has intentionally weak protection - relying instead on a "
|