Anonymous user
Talk:Break OO privacy: Difference between revisions
→Context?: +1
No edit summary |
(→Context?: +1) |
||
Line 12:
When I saw the task title before reading the details, I assumed it was about accessing “private” fields of an object ''other than'' by the explicit code of the object (i.e. the Tcl example is appropriate, the C# and Java ones are not). —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 00:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
: I agree. The Java one is now restructured to only present the backdoor approach. I lack the expertise to do this with the C# code, but there must be something possible. I guess this means we're getting closer to being able to write the task description more exactly… –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
| |||