Anonymous user
Talk:Break OO privacy: Difference between revisions
→What is needed to get this out of draft?: Great changes.
m (→Valid Uses?: “_” -> “ ”) |
(→What is needed to get this out of draft?: Great changes.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 58:
* Elaborate on the un-idiomatic usage warning about dangers etc.
Thoughts anyone? --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 18:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
: Seems reasonable to me. The degree to which low-level hacking is required will probably vary by language though, and there's probably a need to cross-link to some tasks on introspection. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 18:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
I agree with TimToady's updates and his move out of draft.
I especially liked this bit:
:'' if your language intentionally maintains a double-standard for OO privacy ...''
--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 07:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)<br>:-)
| |||