Talk:Brace expansion: Difference between revisions
→Duplicate supression
Line 81:
::::::::::: Well the second bullet point of the spec includes an example which showcases duplicate alternatives. But I additionally added the phrase "''(which need not be unique)''" now to that paragraph, to make it more explicit. --[[User:Smls|Smls]] ([[User talk:Smls|talk]]) 23:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
::::::::::: I tried the perl implementation against this spec. It's broken. If I use the pattern ab{c,d\,e{f,g\h},i\,j{k,l\,m}n,o\,p}qr I see no result line which contains both an 'f' and a 'k'. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 01:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
| |||