Talk:Boolean values: Difference between revisions
→Rename page?: new section
m (moved Talk:True/False Values to Talk:Boolean values) |
(→Rename page?: new section) |
||
Line 2:
:It's already been noted. a merge is in the works. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry about the wait. All done. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
== Rename page? ==
This page only deals with the two-valued boolean algebra.
This leaves out some important history and the full scope of what the word "Boolean" means. http://sumon3get.hubpages.com/hub/Basic-Concept-And-History-Of-Boolean-Algebra
Remedies might include:
1. A new page title that somehow incorporates the phrase "two valued".
2. A new Rosetta code task which treats some other subset of boolean values. For example, here's a table the boolean operation which corresponds to "logical and" on the integers 0 through 3:
<lang J> *. table i. 4
┌──┬───────┐
│*.│0 1 2 3│
├──┼───────┤
│0 │0 0 0 0│
│1 │0 1 2 3│
│2 │0 2 2 6│
│3 │0 3 6 3│
└──┴───────┘</lang>
(this operation is "least common multiple",).
And here's the boolean operation which corresponds to "logical or" (greatest common divisor) on these integers:
+. table i. 4
┌──┬───────┐
│+.│0 1 2 3│
├──┼───────┤
│0 │0 1 2 3│
│1 │1 1 1 1│
│2 │2 1 2 1│
│3 │3 1 1 3│
└──┴───────┘</lang>
Note also that "logical not" is not a boolean operation in and of itself. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 13:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
| |||