Talk:Boids: Difference between revisions

Python code is for the board, not the simulation
No edit summary
(Python code is for the board, not the simulation)
Line 8:
 
::: This Python version is readable and it doesn't have obstacles. http://code.activestate.com/recipes/502240-boids-version-11/ Removing the GUI code it's about 120 lines of non-comment Python code. Is this too much for a RosettaCode Task?
::::The Python code generates the board but what about the actual task? What are the rules for the simulation? Also it's not very good practice to rely on code as an explanation for an entire task. Explaining things in English, pseudocode, or diagrams/tables is preferred. Not everybody can read Python (including me). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 04:27, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Anonymous user