Revision as of 23:29, 7 January 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Bearophile No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:58, 8 January 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Bearophile No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6: :: I agree the Task specification is incomplete and needs improvements. (I think a Boids task is good for RosettaCode because the code needed for such simulation is not too much long, and it's a kind of task not overrepresented in RC.) -[[User:Bearophile\|bearophile]] 23:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC) ::: This Python version is readable and it doesn't have obstacles. http://code.activestate.com/recipes/502240-boids-version-11/ Removing the GUI code it's about 120 lines of non-comment Python code. Is this too much for a RosettaCode Task?

Talk:Boids: Difference between revisions

Talk:Boids (view source)