Anonymous user
Talk:Bitmap: Difference between revisions
→Amount of comments: new section
(→Interface vs Implementation: hard for fortran) |
(→Amount of comments: new section) |
||
Line 15:
I noticed that [[User:Mbishop|Mbishop]] separated Modula-3's interface from its implementation last night. I think that's actually a very good idea, and should be done for any language where it's considered best practice. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 17:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
: About Fortran I gave up; separating interface and implementation would mean to make the whole stuff a lot longer; and it would make sense if one wants to give the compiled code (while not undisclosing source) and make in the same time people to use the library. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 23:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
== Amount of comments ==
This is in particular related to J section. I completely agree that everybody has his own style of documenting the code, and J particularly favors brevity. However, in my opinion, for someone new in J extra comments could be quite helpful, and the purpose of this site is to show how to solve simple tasks.
So, I'd appreciate opinions about what is, in practice, a good level of commenting here for such a language.
| |||