Talk:Bitmap/Histogram: Difference between revisions
m
moved Talk:Image histogram to Talk:Bitmap/Histogram: This is a subtask of Bitmap.
(Uploading) |
Underscore (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Image histogram to Talk:Bitmap/Histogram: This is a subtask of Bitmap.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 31:
:::::OK, if you think that black and white images deserve a separate task, you can create it. But this task was to use histogram in order to create black and white art image, which is still a grayscale one. I could use three clusters instead of two, or N clusters, but I felt it overstretched to add local maximum/minimum search or other methods of clustering. Would that be a three-color image task then? The number of result colors is irrelevant in the task. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 15:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::You just do not get it. It is not about the number of colors. The point is that the black and white conversion ''should not be here at all''. This task is titled '''Image histogram''', so one would expect it to be about creating a histogram. Not about b/w conversion. If you insist that there must be a task for b/w conversion, you can create it. But, as I said, there probably is not much use for such task. --[[User:PauliKL|PauliKL]] 21:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||