Talk:Binary strings: Difference between revisions
→Alternative implementation: new section
(→Comment: PureBasic does not have real binary strings: new section) |
(→Alternative implementation: new section) |
||
Line 45:
but the code required for handling such,
is more evolved, than I am prepared to produce at this moment.
== Alternative implementation ==
"If your language of choice does have this built-in support, show a possible alternative implementation for the functions or abilities already provided by the language."
For a language that has no limitations on byte values within a byte string, reimplementing something so primitive would be madness, and thankfully, no one yet has taken it seriously. Reimplement without using bytes? without using arrays? Or, use existing language features, but pointlessly wrap them in functions with more cumbersome syntax? As worded, I can't imagine the task as anything but an exercise in obfuscation. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 00:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||