Talk:Binary strings: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Alternative implementation: new section) |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
For a language that has no limitations on byte values within a byte string, reimplementing something so primitive would be madness, and thankfully, no one yet has taken it seriously. Reimplement without using bytes? without using arrays? Or, use existing language features, but pointlessly wrap them in functions with more cumbersome syntax? As worded, I can't imagine the task as anything but an exercise in obfuscation. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 00:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
For a language that has no limitations on byte values within a byte string, reimplementing something so primitive would be madness, and thankfully, no one yet has taken it seriously. Reimplement without using bytes? without using arrays? Or, use existing language features, but pointlessly wrap them in functions with more cumbersome syntax? As worded, I can't imagine the task as anything but an exercise in obfuscation. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 00:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Different mood today. I posted a solution. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 21:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||